Credibility of Arab Satellite Channels Among War’s Casualties
| Sunday April
13, 2003
Raid Qusti, Special to
Arab News RIYADH, 13 April 2003 — The fall of Baghdad to American forces was
met with feelings of betrayal, disbelief, and shock here in Saudi
Arabia. Many Saudis are still trying to figure out how the capital could give
in to the American forces without putting up any significant resistance.
Unanswered questions loom in the minds of Saudis as to how it all
happened. One theory is that Condoleezza Rice, in her meeting with
Russian officials, was told that Saddam would be allowed to go into
exile to Russia on condition that he ordered his officers not to resist
and thus allow US forces an easy victory. This theory, along with many others, is all over Arab websites and
Saudi gatherings. But everyone wants to know what really happened. This
time, however, there is no Iraqi information minister on Al-Jazeera and
Abu Dhabi TV to give people the answers they want to hear. Toward the
Arab satellite channels, a sense of betrayal is already taking hold.
Saudis did not see the 1991 Gulf War live on television because
satellite dishes were forbidden. “Operation Iraqi Freedom” 13 years
later was watched in every Saudi household live. Saudi citizens had the
opportunity to view the coverage on every news channel on the planet.
Many educated people watched the major American networks, such as MSNBC,
Fox News, and CNN. But for the majority of Saudis, the choice was Al-Jazeera and Abu
Dhabi TV. Al-Jazeera is known as the first Arabic satellite news channel
and Abu Dhabi TV is known for its bold coverage. Both channels were
given credit for transmitting images that many American networks refused
to air, such as footage of buildings destroyed by US bombs and the
innocents flooding Iraqi hospitals from the bombardments. But after the
unexpectedly quick fall of the capital, questions are now being raised
as to how objective and fair the reports of those two channels might
really have been. All along, both channels in their analysis were telling their viewers
in the Arab world that the south had not fallen to the American and
British forces, even a couple days before the capital itself fell.
Reports continued about how pockets of resistance were giving the
invading forces a hard fight and that Iraqis had not given up their
positions in the city. This claim was the opposite to what Western media channels were
saying from the reports of their embedded journalists with American and
British forces. Many Saudis are now thinking that they were following a
mirage. The closer they thought they were getting to the truth, the
further they were from reality. Now that Baghdad has fallen, Saudis are in a dilemma. They are
feeling betrayed by their Arab satellite channels who had kept them
believing that the Iraqi resistance did have a chance to whip the
American forces, they are also confused. They wanted Saddam Hussein out,
but did not want to see an American invasion of Iraq. They wanted —
and still want — to see a better Iraq, but at the same time, do not
trust America’s intentions in the region. One Arab commenting on the fall of Baghdad said on an Arab satellite
television channel: It is wrong to say Baghdad fell. The Baath part is
what fell, not Baghdad. The center of Islam and great civilizations of
the past will never fall. His feelings are shared by many here. However, some people do believe that the American invasion of Iraq
will bring some sort of democracy as it will have removed a tyrant that
had his people living in fear for 30 years. But the majority will never
look at America as a liberating force. The reason? Very simply put:
Palestine. As long as Arabs in general continue to see the United States
as blindly supporting Israel, nothing will change. As long as America
turns a blind eye and a deaf ear to the incursions of Israeli forces to
Palestinian-held territories and the Israeli bulldozers destroying
Palestinian homes, Arabs will continue to distrust America. As long as America vetoes every single UN resolution punishing Israel
for its crimes, as it has been doing in the past 50 years, it will
always be looked at as the other face of the Israeli coin. Solving the Palestinian issue is close to the heart of every Arab and
Muslim because Jerusalem is home to the third holiest Islamic shrine. It is the key to winning the hearts and minds of everyone in the Arab
world. Only then will America be trusted by the majority of people in
Saudi Arabia and the region. But until that happens, Saudis who are glad
to see Saddam gone are bound to remain skeptical about the American
presence in the region. Credibility of Arab satellite channels one of the casualties of war Raid Qusti Special to Arab News RIYADH — The fall of Baghdad to American forces was met with
feelings of betrayal, disbelief, and shock here in Saudi Arabia. Many Saudis are still trying to figure out how the capital could give
in to the American forces without putting up any significant resistance
or fight. Unanswered questions loom in the minds of Saudis as to how it
all happened. One theory here is that Condoleezza Rice in her meeting
with Russian officials was told that Saddam would be allowed to go into
exile to Russia on condition that he order his officers not to resist
and allow US forces an easy victory. This theory, along with all sorts of others, is all over Arab
websites and Saudi gatherings. But everyone wants to know what really
happened. This time, however, there is no Iraqi information minister on Al-Jazeera
and Abu Dhabi TV to give people the answers they want to hear. Toward
the Arab satellite channels, a sense of betrayal is already taking hold. Saudis did not see the 1991 Gulf War live on television because
satellite dishes were not allowed. “Operation Iraqi Freedom” 13
years later was watched in every Saudi household live. Saudi citizens,
13 years after the first Gulf War, had the opportunity to view the
coverage on every imaginable news channel on the planet. Many educated
people watched the major American networks such as MSNBC, Fox News, and
CNN. But for the majority of Saudis, it was Al-Jazeera and Abu Dhabi TV.
Those were the two dominating news channels viewed in most Saudi
households. Al-Jazeera is known as the first Arabic satellite news
channel and Abu Dhabi TV is known for its bold coverage. Both channels were given credit for transmitting images that many
American networks refused to air, such as footage of buildings destroyed
by US bombs and the innocents flooding Iraqi hospitals from the
bombardments. But after the unexpectedly quick fall of the capital,
questions are now being raised as to how objective and fair the reports
of those two channels could have been. All along, both channels in their analysis were telling their viewers
in the Arab world that the south had not fallen to the American and
British forces, even a couple days before the capital fell. Reports
continued about how pockets of resistance were giving the invading
forces a hard fight and that Iraqis had not given up their positions in
the city. This claim was contrary to what Western media channels were
saying from the reports of their embedded journalists with American and
British forces. Many Saudis are now thinking that they were following a mirage. The
closer they thought they were getting to the truth, the further they
were from reality. Now that Baghdad has fallen, Saudis are in a dilemma. Not only are
they feeling betrayed by their Arab satellite channels who had kept them
believing that the Iraqi resistance did have a chance to whip the
American forces, but they feel caught in the middle of everything that
has happened. They wanted Saddam Hussein out, but did not want to see an
American invasion of Iraq. They wanted — and still want — to see a
better Iraq, but at the same time, do not trust America’s intentions
in the area. One Arab commenting on the fall of Baghdad said on an Arab satellite
television channel: It is wrong to say Baghdad fell. The Baath part is
what fell, not Baghdad. The center of Islam and great civilizations of
the past will never fall. His feelings are shared by many here. However, some people do believe that the American invasion of Iraq
will bring some sort of democracy as it will have removed a tyrant that
had his people living in fear for 30 years. But the majority will never
look at America as a liberating force. The reason? Very simply put:
Palestine. As long as Arabs in general continue to see the United States as
blindly supporting Israel, nothing will change. As long as America turns
a blind eye and a deaf ear to the incursions of Israeli forces to
Palestinian-held territories and the Israeli bulldozers destroying
Palestinian homes, Arabs will continue to distrust America. As long as
America vetoes every single UN resolution to punish Israel for its
crimes as it has been doing in the past 50 years, it will always be
looked at as the other face of the Israeli coin. Solving the Palestinian issue is close to the heart of every Arab and
Muslim because Jerusalem is home to the third holiest Islamic Mosque. It
is the key to winning the hearts and minds of everyone in the Arab
world. Only then will America be trusted by the majority of people in
Saudi Arabia and the region. But until that happens, Saudis who are glad to see Saddam gone are
bound to remain skeptical about the American presence in the region. Credibility of Arab satellite channels one of the casualties of war Raid Qusti Special to Arab News RIYADH — The fall of Baghdad to American forces was met with
feelings of betrayal, disbelief, and shock here in Saudi Arabia. Many Saudis are still trying to figure out how the capital could give
in to the American forces without putting up any significant resistance
or fight. Unanswered questions loom in the minds of Saudis as to how it
all happened. One theory here is that Condoleezza Rice in her meeting
with Russian officials was told that Saddam would be allowed to go into
exile to Russia on condition that he order his officers not to resist
and allow US forces an easy victory. This theory, along with all sorts of others, is all over Arab
websites and Saudi gatherings. But everyone wants to know what really
happened. This time, however, there is no Iraqi information minister on Al-Jazeera
and Abu Dhabi TV to give people the answers they want to hear. Toward
the Arab satellite channels, a sense of betrayal is already taking hold. Saudis did not see the 1991 Gulf War live on television because
satellite dishes were not allowed. “Operation Iraqi Freedom” 13
years later was watched in every Saudi household live. Saudi citizens,
13 years after the first Gulf War, had the opportunity to view the
coverage on every imaginable news channel on the planet. Many educated
people watched the major American networks such as MSNBC, Fox News, and
CNN. But for the majority of Saudis, it was Al-Jazeera and Abu Dhabi TV.
Those were the two dominating news channels viewed in most Saudi
households. Al-Jazeera is known as the first Arabic satellite news
channel and Abu Dhabi TV is known for its bold coverage. Both channels were given credit for transmitting images that many
American networks refused to air, such as footage of buildings destroyed
by US bombs and the innocents flooding Iraqi hospitals from the
bombardments. But after the unexpectedly quick fall of the capital,
questions are now being raised as to how objective and fair the reports
of those two channels could have been. All along, both channels in their analysis were telling their viewers
in the Arab world that the south had not fallen to the American and
British forces, even a couple days before the capital fell. Reports
continued about how pockets of resistance were giving the invading
forces a hard fight and that Iraqis had not given up their positions in
the city. This claim was contrary to what Western media channels were
saying from the reports of their embedded journalists with American and
British forces. Many Saudis are now thinking that they were following a mirage. The
closer they thought they were getting to the truth, the further they
were from reality. Now that Baghdad has fallen, Saudis are in a dilemma. Not only are
they feeling betrayed by their Arab satellite channels who had kept them
believing that the Iraqi resistance did have a chance to whip the
American forces, but they feel caught in the middle of everything that
has happened. They wanted Saddam Hussein out, but did not want to see an
American invasion of Iraq. They wanted — and still want — to see a
better Iraq, but at the same time, do not trust America’s intentions
in the area. One Arab commenting on the fall of Baghdad said on an Arab satellite
television channel: It is wrong to say Baghdad fell. The Baath part is
what fell, not Baghdad. The center of Islam and great civilizations of
the past will never fall. His feelings are shared by many here. However, some people do believe that the American invasion of Iraq
will bring some sort of democracy as it will have removed a tyrant that
had his people living in fear for 30 years. But the majority will never
look at America as a liberating force. The reason? Very simply put:
Palestine. As long as Arabs in general continue to see the United States as
blindly supporting Israel, nothing will change. As long as America turns
a blind eye and a deaf ear to the incursions of Israeli forces to
Palestinian-held territories and the Israeli bulldozers destroying
Palestinian homes, Arabs will continue to distrust America. As long as
America vetoes every single UN resolution to punish Israel for its
crimes as it has been doing in the past 50 years, it will always be
looked at as the other face of the Israeli coin. Solving the Palestinian issue is close to the heart of every Arab and
Muslim because Jerusalem is home to the third holiest Islamic Mosque. It
is the key to winning the hearts and minds of everyone in the Arab
world. Only then will America be trusted by the majority of people in
Saudi Arabia and the region. But until that happens, Saudis who are glad to see Saddam gone are
bound to remain skeptical about the American presence in the region. Credibility of Arab satellite channels one of the casualties of war Raid Qusti Special to Arab News RIYADH — The fall of Baghdad to American forces was met with
feelings of betrayal, disbelief, and shock here in Saudi Arabia. Many Saudis are still trying to figure out how the capital could give
in to the American forces without putting up any significant resistance
or fight. Unanswered questions loom in the minds of Saudis as to how it
all happened. One theory here is that Condoleezza Rice in her meeting
with Russian officials was told that Saddam would be allowed to go into
exile to Russia on condition that he order his officers not to resist
and allow US forces an easy victory. This theory, along with all sorts of others, is all over Arab
websites and Saudi gatherings. But everyone wants to know what really
happened. This time, however, there is no Iraqi information minister on Al-Jazeera
and Abu Dhabi TV to give people the answers they want to hear. Toward
the Arab satellite channels, a sense of betrayal is already taking hold. Saudis did not see the 1991 Gulf War live on television because
satellite dishes were not allowed. “Operation Iraqi Freedom” 13
years later was watched in every Saudi household live. Saudi citizens,
13 years after the first Gulf War, had the opportunity to view the
coverage on every imaginable news channel on the planet. Many educated
people watched the major American networks such as MSNBC, Fox News, and
CNN. But for the majority of Saudis, it was Al-Jazeera and Abu Dhabi TV.
Those were the two dominating news channels viewed in most Saudi
households. Al-Jazeera is known as the first Arabic satellite news
channel and Abu Dhabi TV is known for its bold coverage. Both channels were given credit for transmitting images that many
American networks refused to air, such as footage of buildings destroyed
by US bombs and the innocents flooding Iraqi hospitals from the
bombardments. But after the unexpectedly quick fall of the capital,
questions are now being raised as to how objective and fair the reports
of those two channels could have been. All along, both channels in their analysis were telling their viewers
in the Arab world that the south had not fallen to the American and
British forces, even a couple days before the capital fell. Reports
continued about how pockets of resistance were giving the invading
forces a hard fight and that Iraqis had not given up their positions in
the city. This claim was contrary to what Western media channels were
saying from the reports of their embedded journalists with American and
British forces. Many Saudis are now thinking that they were following a mirage. The
closer they thought they were getting to the truth, the further they
were from reality. Now that Baghdad has fallen, Saudis are in a dilemma. Not only are
they feeling betrayed by their Arab satellite channels who had kept them
believing that the Iraqi resistance did have a chance to whip the
American forces, but they feel caught in the middle of everything that
has happened. They wanted Saddam Hussein out, but did not want to see an
American invasion of Iraq. They wanted — and still want — to see a
better Iraq, but at the same time, do not trust America’s intentions
in the area. One Arab commenting on the fall of Baghdad said on an Arab satellite
television channel: It is wrong to say Baghdad fell. The Baath part is
what fell, not Baghdad. The center of Islam and great civilizations of
the past will never fall. His feelings are shared by many here. However, some people do believe that the American invasion of Iraq
will bring some sort of democracy as it will have removed a tyrant that
had his people living in fear for 30 years. But the majority will never
look at America as a liberating force. The reason? Very simply put:
Palestine. As long as Arabs in general continue to see the United States as
blindly supporting Israel, nothing will change. As long as America turns
a blind eye and a deaf ear to the incursions of Israeli forces to
Palestinian-held territories and the Israeli bulldozers destroying
Palestinian homes, Arabs will continue to distrust America. As long as
America vetoes every single UN resolution to punish Israel for its
crimes as it has been doing in the past 50 years, it will always be
looked at as the other face of the Israeli coin. Solving the Palestinian issue is close to the heart of every Arab and
Muslim because Jerusalem is home to the third holiest Islamic Mosque. It
is the key to winning the hearts and minds of everyone in the Arab
world. Only then will America be trusted by the majority of people in
Saudi Arabia and the region. But until that happens, Saudis who are glad to see Saddam gone are
bound to remain skeptical about the American presence in the region. |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org