Journalists Die and Networks Lie
| Thursday April
10, 2003
Linda S. Heard, Special
to Arab News “We almost had eye-to-eye contact,” he said. He wonders how
independent reporters (as opposed to embeds) can continue to do their
job when such danger emanates from their own side. Not from the Iraqi
side but from “their boys”. That’s the whole idea. Those people
who are giving the orders to fire upon journalists want them to flee in
terror. Joe Public must not see the future lot of Baghdad’s long-suffering
civilians. We have seen too much already. The Baghdad office of Al-
Jazeera, housed in a residential district, was hit too — very
reminiscent of Kabul. This time a journalist and a cameraman lost their
lives. Al-Jazeera’s mistake was to have given the Pentagon its
coordinates. A further “accident” on the same day resulted in a Reuters
vehicle being attacked, and another “stray” bomb or missile
“coincidentally” destroyed the office of Abu Dhabi Television
causing severe injuries. Early on in this war, ITV’s Terry Lloyd was
allegedly the victim of a US bullet while two of his colleagues went
missing after the same incident. The Pentagon tells us that it is still investigating, yet even while
their own employees fall, Western television networks refuse to condemn
this assault on the truth, making excuse after excuse about the “fog
of war.” In a “blue on blue” incident, a 25-year-old BBC
translator was killed in northern Iraq and a cameraman wounded in the
head when a convoy of Kurdish fighters and American special forces was
bombed. But veteran BBC reporter John Simpson, who was slightly injured
during the attack, calmly commented that such things happen during
conflicts and thanked the Americans traveling with them for their first
aid capabilities. How polite! “Your chappie has just killed my friend but, hey, such things
happen. Thanks for the bandages, by the way.” From the point of view of the coalition of two and a bit who repeats
over and over again that “every effort is being made to protect
civilians” while casually throwing out the line “civilian casualties
are regretted,” what shouldn’t we know? We should not have learned
about soldiers who shoot first and ask questions later, as seven Iraqi
women and children found to their cost as well as the drivers and
passengers of numerous vehicles, erroneously mistaken for suicide
bombers. We should not be told that the coalition boys and girls are
dropping cluster bombs and firing depleted uranium tank shells, without
any thought to how much misery these weapons of mass destruction will
certainly cause in the future. We should not have seen the British
marines, who when arresting a middle-aged suspect, forced him to the
ground and repeatedly yanked off his kuffiyeh (Arab headdress) — an
appalling insult to that man’s dignity and his traditions. We should
not have been witness to the way that prisoners were handcuffed and
hooded by this “liberating army.” There is a photograph doing the rounds of a hooded man cuddling his
terrified infant behind coils of barbed wire. One can only wonder what
that boy will think of his “liberators” when he grows up. In Najaf,
American soldiers headed toward the golden-domed Imam Ali Mosque, one of
the most sacred Shiite sites, and were kept back by sheer people power.
Hundreds of unarmed men steadfastly marched toward those armored
servants of the US military machine, shaking their fists in a rare
display of courage. The confused soldiers were ordered to step back and
smile. We were not told by our media of the bravery of those men
defending an icon of their religion, only of the diplomacy of the
American troops in retreating. In Nassiriyah, an enraged middle-aged
resident shouted his objection to women being subjected to body searches
at checkpoints, and called Bush, Hussein and others “liars.” He then sobbed tears of frustration and humiliation. This emotive
scene, which has caused outrage in the Muslim world, was courtesy of Al-Jazeera,
Pentagon bad boy No. 1 CNN, Fox News, NBC, the BBC and Sky News are
trying to sell us an antiseptic war, one in which there are no torn and
bleeding victims. In their war, the enemy is destroyed in its thousands while the US/UK
forces suffer only those losses inescapably witnessed by the cameras of
independent journalists. A BBC spokesman, when asked why the British
network was portraying such a sterile conflict, said that people with
children wouldn’t like gory images coming into their living rooms. In other words, it’s fine for those sensitive souls to support
their nation’s finest, but not to see the obscene results of their
handiwork. The Anglo-American media hasn’t shrunk from distorting the
truth and putting out disinformation in its scrambling to prove which
one of its outlets can serve as the most effective propaganda arm.
Meanwhile, Britain’s Sun newspaper — a Murdoch-owned tabloid —
puts the photograph of a dissenting British Member of Parliament on its
front cover with the word ‘Traitor’ emblazoned on the page. It even
went so far as to publish his e-mail address and telephone number,
inciting its ignorant readers to tell the MP their thoughts. The result was a barrage of insults and death threats forcing the
paper’s victim to surround himself with bodyguards. Al- Jazeera has been accused of following an agenda too and thus has
been evicted from the New York Stock Exchange, the victim of
professional hackers. It has consequently had to look for a new server
for its website. While it is true that Al-Jazeera is certainly playing
to the bias of its Arab audience, it does show graphic videos, worth
more than a million words. It didn’t concoct those images of
ashen-faced, lifeless babies, victims of carpet bombs in Al-Hilla or
those heartrending scenes of the victims of man’s inhumanity to man
filling the beds and covering the floors of Iraqi hospitals. Iraqi television has an agenda too. It’s called “showing your
side of the story against all odds.” It made the mistake of screening
a downed Apache helicopter and was bombed. It later ran images of
captured American service personnel and dead British pilots and the
Ministry of Information was promptly targeted. Broadcasting out of the
Palestine Hotel — temporary home of foreign journalists — Iraqi
television still won’t do as it’s told. After it showed footage of a
burning American vehicle, the US/UK forces promptly unleashed a warning
bomb just 100 yards from the hotel. According to their spokesman,
pressure is being put on those companies which sell satellite time to
Iraqi TV to desist. The Pentagon, however, feels free to manipulate the truth to its
heart’s content, such as the rescue of one of its female soldiers, the
now famous Jessica. They made it look like a re-run of Entebbe. The
helicopter landed, the troops rushed out and after creating a diversion,
rushed into Jessica’s hospital room before carrying her off to safety. Heroes all! During their press briefings they made no mention of the
Iraqi doctor who had told them where she was. They did not say that the
hospital had not been guarded and that Jessica had been well treated and
they did not dampen the rumors that she had been shot several times. It
took her father to do that. It would probably have suited the US administration better had she
been tortured and raped. And how the British press lapped up those
photographs of US servicemen lounging around one of Saddam’s many
palaces, taken by embedded reporters who ensured we knew that the Iraqi
leader had gold taps on his bidet while his people starved. Couldn’t
we say the same about Buckingham Palace while children sleep in the
doorways of nearby Regent Street or the White House while bag ladies
doss out in cardboard boxes? In Basra, the people have already been “liberated” and are
celebrating their freedom by looting and stealing while British
commanders look on saying that there is nothing they can do about such
lawlessness. (I do hope Athens will be freed soon. There’s a gold
bracelet in the window of a jewelry store at the end of my street, which
would look great on my wrist). Iraq’s new interim rulers — led by
Viceroy-Designate pro-Likud former US Gen. Jay Garner — are patiently
awaiting their glorious destiny. Iraqi exiles beg for jobs in the new
Iraq power base. Like Hamid Karzai before him, the normally well
turned-out Ahmed Chalabi, head of the Iraqi National Congress, has
donned a uniform and headed off to northern Iraq to make his victorious
entry into Baghdad like Hannibal without the elephant. American oil companies wait for this war to receive a stamp of
legality from the United Nations before they can draw up lucrative
contracts. US companies look forward to being recipients of bounty from
Iraq’s reconstruction and the Israelis hope for a long-awaited oil
pipeline from northern Iraq to Haifa. Evangelical Messianic Christians
circle like soul-scalping vultures in Jordan until they can make their
vainglorious entry into Baghdad bearing bread and Bibles. In the
meantime, the Iraqis cry rivers of tears, comfort their children and
bury their dead while the gagged and compliant media bury theirs. (Linda S. Heard is a specialist writer on Middle East affairs. Arab News Opinion 10 April 2003 |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org