Iraq War: The Agenda Is No Longer Hidden
| Friday May 16, 2003
Muhammad Al-Shibani It is now more than a month since the fall of Baghdad. The repressive
regime has disappeared and we are beginning to see signs of a slowly
emerging new system that will have its own allies and agenda. The
picture is still unclear and the country still lacks stability and
security. People are puzzled, not knowing what direction to take or whom
to trust to lead them assuming they have the right of choice. The Baathists have changed their skin and assumed new appearances.
The religious people slipped out of their cloaks, hoping to satisfy the
White House master and win his sympathy. Those who had fled the country
and lived abroad for decades suddenly assumed the dual role of victim
and savior and began to show how concerned they are about the country by
offering their services. Under the surface, however, there is a lot of movement. Plans are
being drawn and preparations made. Simmering conflicts are about to
explode. Some of them will soon be obvious for every one to see; others
will remain buried until the time is ripe for them to come into the
open. It may be years before the full picture became clear and the
long-awaited results were known. In the Arab arena, politicians have miraculously assumed the role of
journalists, cursing a regime that only yesterday they courted and
appeased. They always chose to deal with the status quo, regardless of
whether it was good or bad. Arab governments and peoples are united in their abilities to forget.
They have forgotten and abandoned a major Arab country which has now
fallen under foreign occupation. Many have already begun to get used to
the new reality. * * * Diplomats usually resort to the most vague and ambiguous words and
phrases to express themselves. Their words carry different meanings and
never say what is meant. The expression “diplomat” is often used to
describe someone who is devious and tricky, who would politely tell you
one thing while in fact meaning something totally different. Some diplomats and officials, however, seem to lack these qualities.
Among these are two Westerners who did not resort to diplomatic language
when it came to revealing the real intentions behind the invasion of
Iraq. Paul Nelson, who is the European Commissioner for Development and
Humanitarian Assistance, said following a visit to Iraq that the United
States has put its hands on Iraqi oil. He added sarcastically that
America would soon join OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries. US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld described Iraq as a country
with no history of democratic tradition. Therefore, according to him, it
will take time for democracy to take root. He said the reconstruction of
the country could take years — which means the occupation of Iraq may
last for some time, though it was originally thought it would only be a
year or two. The real intentions behind the invasion are becoming clearer. They
might have been known before, but those who might have voiced them
joined the American chorus and continued to doubt such motives. They
insisted America did not want to control Iraq’s oil and that
Washington would only remove the regime and then give the Iraqi people
the chance to govern themselves. American blood is very precious in the
eyes of the American government and is only spilled when the end will
benefit the American people at present and in the foreseeable future. * * * (Muhammad Al-Shibani is a Saudi writer based in Jeddah.) Arab News Features 16 May 2003 |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org