Swallowing Everything Whole
| Thursday May 8, 2003
Dr. Mohammad T. Al-Rasheed Colin Powell came and went. He had a “frank” discussion with the
Syrians. He subsequently turned out on the Sunday talk shows and spelled
out the nature of this “frank” discussion. It basically amounted to
either you do this, or else. Newt Gingrich did not like what had
happened. He called the visit “ludicrous.” Rumsfeld denied he had
authorized the Gingrich remark or had heard it before. President Bush
flew a jet onto an aircraft carrier and managed somehow to solicit the
impossible from Fox News: A snide remark about the macho image that
seemed embarrassing enough. Basra, under British control, is eerily quiet while all areas under
American control, including Baghdad, are seething with anger and
incidents that invariably produce casualties. There is something to be
said for colonial expertise. Americans (soldiers if not politicians)
would rather be back home in time for the summer baseball season instead
of building and running a colonial officers club replete with endless
bottles of gin and staffed by liveried locals. The “Road Map” for Middle East peace has been handed to the
concerned parties. I haven’t been privy to its details, but I can
assure you that it did not take into consideration the nature of our
roads around here. It probably is a sanitized version of Interstate 70
crossing the continental United States from east to west. Unfortunately,
our roads here are dusty and ancient. They are made for mules and
donkeys and not for vehicles that shut the world out in an
air-conditioned space filled with surround music. It is true that some
venerable feet have kicked up dust on these roads over the ages, but
Sharon and Arafat are not among them. Those two are as alien as the
creatures of Mary Shelley’s nightmares. If this is the sum of last week’s news, then little has changed.
The Middle East, yet again, proves its ability to swallow everything and
everyone and continue in its old ways. The fun is over and when the
President is finished with his victory tours and people are simply
saturated with parades and speeches from aircraft carriers, the reality
of the Middle East will rise again as if nothing has changed. This is
the enigmatic nature of this place. And this is what the Administration
does not understand but will soon find out. The only clear advantage the Administration has is its military
power. Once that power is idle, it becomes much like any other power.
The days are long and hot, with no possible relief until October.
Rumsfeld and co. are jittery and instinctively know of the pitfalls
ahead. To keep the advantage, the military will have to be engaged. That
is why the “Syria next” scenario is alarmingly feasible, if not in
the final planning stages already. When threatening words toward Syria
come from the ‘moderate’ Powell, they are indicative of something
more sinister in the minds of the more hawkish officials. The Middle East, for some odd reason that has baffled academics let
alone politicians, does not subscribe to political norms, no matter
where the origins of such norms are. This is not necessarily good or
bad. It simply is a reality. Syria, for example, is the only place on
earth that had three coup d’etats in one day. If there is a lesson to
be learned in this, it is the fact that fame and glory can be achieved
swiftly; and just as swiftly, they can be lost. The dictates of realpolitik, therefore, demand that the Americans, in
order to keep the advantage, will have to keep those tanks on the move.
I am sure that Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and Perle have no problem with this
scenario. Gingrich’s comments were not spontaneous or off the cuff.
They portend a reality we will soon have to accept. What remains to be
seen is how the American public reacts to this new twist. I am sure that
there will be in the months to come a campaign of vilification aimed at
Syria. You can already see the beginnings of it. Fox News is already
referring to Syria as “that country.” Unfortunately for the administration, Assad Jr.’s hands are clean.
He also is trying to make things “better” for his people. It might
not be enough, but it certainly is better than what Saddam has been
doing in Iraq. Somehow, I don’t think that will make any difference to
the plans being prepared for him. - Arab News Opinion 8 May 2003 |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org