Oil for Food: An Imperial Equation
| Monday April
28, 2003
Hassan Tahsin Kofi Annan’s decision to halt the oil for food program prior to the
Anglo-American invasion of Iraq without a decision from the Security
Council and solely on American orders is considered a breach of the
United Nations Charter. This is by far the worst and most dangerous
decision that any secretary-general has made since the inception of the
United Nations. American foreign policy planners have worked since the
eighties to bring down and destroy Iraq. Like lambs being led to the
slaughter, they lured the political leadership to wage war against Iran.
Then after having been overstrained, politically, economically and
socially they were again enticed to invade Kuwait, bringing on another
Gulf War, followed by international sanctions and the consequent
obliteration of the Iraqi nation. It would have been so easy to destroy
Saddam Hussein’s regime with Kuwait liberated but the American plan
was to make sure that the regime stayed in place. Then came the new
military invasion campaign — the reasons for it varied between the
Anglo-American political leadership, finally resting on the need to get
rid of Saddam, his weapons of mass destruction and to give Iraq
American-style democracy ensuring it becomes a protégé of Washington. During the Second Gulf War, Iraq was bombed more than 200 times with
deadly ethylene gas and depleted uranium. According to reports of the
oil for food program’s executive committee, widespread harmful
radiation affected more than two million Iraqis; hundreds of
radiation-related injuries have been recorded. During the Iraqi
invasion, American forces purposely targeted vital areas that affect the
nation and not the political leadership. An electricity station was hit
and so was a water purification plant. In Basra, British forces blew up
a food storehouse that the Iraqi government had stockpiled in
anticipation of a military siege. The action wasn’t accidental as it
occurred after the British entered Basra. Once Baghdad was handed over to the Americans, the looting by thugs
and prisoners whom America let loose on the streets began. Meanwhile the
Americans sat back and watched Baghdad and its organizations, which
supposedly belong to the Iraqi people, being destroyed. Washington says
Iraq doesn’t need humanitarian aid because at the moment it has $21
billion in the American branch of the French Bank. What is required then
is a national Iraqi government to lead the country and start providing
the basic necessities to the Iraqi people as quickly as possible. This
can be achieved in record time. Washington however has a different view
— with whom will they be dealing in this so-called reconstruction of
Iraq? In an interview with Dr. Ashraf Al Manilawi — one of the
international observers of the oil for food program, he said: “Today
the American administration claims that it just wants to destroy Saddam
Hussein’s regime and help and liberate the Iraqi people. I say that is
untrue. Washington has targeted that very same Iraqi nation. In the
official report No. 119 (of which I have a copy) issued by the GAO in
1991, before the start of the Second Gulf War — it was stated that the
aim of the war on Iraq was to degrade the will of the civilian
population. In 1995 an official report by Pentagon central command
decided to place chlorine and other materials used to purify drinking
water on the prohibited list in order to prevent Iraq from importing it
— this after destroying factories that produce these substances. The
report lists the number of illnesses to which the people of Iraq would
be subjected as a result of the contaminated water, principally
dysentery and typhoid. These two illnesses are the most widespread in
the country and especially among children, whose mortality rate was half
a million annually.” I once asked Madeleine Albright when she was the permanent
representative of the US on the Security Council about the death of more
than half-a-million Iraqi children as a result of the sanctions: “Is
it worth all these lives?” To which she replied: “Yes it is, and a
lot more besides.” Arab News Opinion 28 April 2003 |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org