The Winding Road to Rebuilding Iraq
| Thursday April
24, 2003
Fawaz Turki For Washington, peace will not be as much fun as war was. The three
initial stages of the conflict — drumming up domestic support,
dispatching the enthused troops and the smart bombs to the region, and
toppling Saddam’s feckless regime — were, well, the easy part. The
fourth stage — rebuilding Iraq — will last longer than all three
combined, and may turn out to be not such an easily attainable goal
after all. “We’re dealing with a country,” Deputy Defense Secretary of
State Paul Wolfowitz facilely told Congress recently, “that can really
finance its own reconstruction relatively soon.” The man is either an
outright optimist or is gifted with self-deception. While Iraq indeed has assets, roughly $18 billion a year in oil
exports, the amount is puny, considering the scale of the task ahead. To
start with, Iraq’s economy is in shambles. It is in debt to the tune
of $116 billion, including $25 billion to Saudi Arabia, $17 billion to
UAE countries, $8 billion each to France and Russia, and $3 billion to
commercial creditors. This does not include $200 billion in “claims
for damages,” or reparations, due to Iran, Kuwait and multinational
corporations. Iraq, in other words, is bankrupt and cannot rely exclusively on its
oil revenue to rebuild, for the more oil it pumps to increase its
earnings, the more the price will fall, leaving it no better than
before. There will not be enough money to go around to finance all
reconstruction needs, including the rebuilding of hospitals, power
plants, telephone exchanges and other vital infrastructure. The bill for
that alone is estimated at something in the neighborhood of $80 billion. And the transition of the Iraqi economy from the Baathist regime’s
central planning to open market will be daunting. Saddam Hussein, an
avid reader of Stalin biographies, had created an economic system
modeled on that of the Soviet Union, marked by central planning, fixed
prices and wages, nationalized public services and generous,
off-the-books payments to regime cronies. After decades of being ravaged by a corrupt government elite that
relied on fear and artifice to function and a brazen kleptocracy that
robbed the country blind, Iraq was left with an economy no one could
fathom (the government released its last budget in 1978) and a
population whose exact size, demographic distribution and life
expectancy no one knew. (Reportedly, for the last 12 years, Iraqis did
not, for example, report deaths to the authorities because they did not
want to turn in the food ration cards of the deceased.) Before Hussein’s disastrous nine-year war with Iran in 1980, his
invasion of Kuwait in 1990, and the 12 years of UN sanctions that
followed, Iraq was on top of the list of developing nations in the
world, flush with oil revenue, an income per capita that had doubled in
the 1970s, and heavy government spending on education and health care. Today the country is a basket case and its climb out of chaos will
not by any means be easy. For Iraq to get out of the hole, in other
words, its immense debt of $300 billion will have to be written off or
deferred. That’s for starters. Then an international aid program —
involving the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund — as
ambitious as the Marshall Plan could begin to address the problems of
reconstruction. Talk about the US going to Iraq to “steal its oil” is naive.
Talk, however, about American companies angling to get a piece of the
action in the rebuilding venture is not. These companies are already
standing in line, including accounting and finance firms that have begun
soliciting the US Agency for International Development for jobs to
revamp Iraq’s central bank and rework its financial system. In the
long term, however, Iraqis will end up, of course, footing the entire
bill. Will the US show good faith in its remonstrative commitment to
rebuilding a “free and democratic Iraq” with a political system
genuinely responsive to the aspirations of the Iraqi people? Before your raise your hopes, I say raise your guard. For consider
the man that the administration has chosen as Iraq’s interim military
governor: Retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner. That’s good old Jay, the
gung-ho defense contractor who developed the Arrow missile-defense
system for Israel, and who visited Tel Aviv a year-and-a-half ago as
guest of the hard-line, Likud-leaning Jewish Institute for National
Security Affairs where he signed that organization’s letter praising
Ariel Sharon’s treatment of Palestinians. Having the know-how to rebuild a country is one thing; winning its
people’s hearts and minds is another. - Arab News Opinion 24 April 2003 |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org