Baghdad Battered by US Gas Bombs
| Monday April
14, 2003
Hassan Tahsin If Washington and London are honest in the justifications they have
presented for launching war, then it is neither possible nor acceptable
that Baghdad and a number of other Iraqi cities should be shelled with
chemical bombs. Yes, that is the truth; Baghdad has been battered with chemical bombs
and bombs carrying highly combustible depleted uranium. The website
www.bbcarabic.com presents a detailed account of the type of weapons and
ammunition used in the current war. Aside from these munitions, advanced cluster bombs carrying ethylene
gas have also been used. They are called MOABs, or massive ordnance
airburst bombs, and they are essentially chemical bombs. These ethylene bombs work by taking advantage of the effect of
exploding fuel in the air. When a mix of fuel and air ignites, it
creates a fireball and a wave of explosions that spread quickly over a
much greater area than traditional explosives. The after-effects of the
explosion are very similar to those of small nuclear bombs but without
the radiation. The American cluster bombs carry ethylene gas, of the kind used in
the Second Gulf War, in three barrels, each of which weighs 100 pounds.
Each barrel contains 75 pounds of ethylene oxide, whose industrial usage
is the production of other chemical compounds such glycol ethylene and
other highly poisonous compounds. As for the way in which these bombs work, a fuse ignites the barrel
at a height of 30 feet which breaks and opens the barrel, and the fuel
is expelled dispersing in the air to create a cloud with a 60-feet
radius and 8-feet depth. The airburst spreads to areas that are difficult to attack with more
traditional bombs. The cloud is poisonous in itself, and exposure to
ethylene oxide leads to lung decay, headaches, nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea and shortness of breath and even cancer and birth defects. The
gas is highly combustible and reactive. After this, the main charge ignites the mix leading to an explosion
that spreads at speeds of 3 km a second — faster than the speed of
sound, and the mix of fuel and air burns at 2,700 degrees Celsius. It is
possible to increase the effect by using additional warheads. Traditional explosives such as TNT pack greater explosive power, but
the MOAB explodes over a longer period of time and is more destructive,
especially in enclosed spaces. The degree of pressure created by the airburst is twice that of
traditional bombs, where the air pressure would only rise to just above
1kg per sq. cm. With the MOAB, the air pressure goes up to 30kg per sq.
cm. The danger doesn’t end there. The explosive mix of fuel and air
traveling at speeds exceeding the speed of sound leave behind a vacuum
that sucks all air and other materials, creating a mushroom cloud. These
explosions cause cerebral concussion or blindness, blockage of air
passageways and collapse of lungs, tearing of eardrums, massive internal
bleeding and displacement and tearing of internal organs, and injuries
from flying objects. These are aside from the injuries mentioned above
which result from inhalation of this poisonous ethylene oxide cloud. It is for these reasons that human rights organizations consider
these MOABs to be weapons of mass destruction. They don’t
differentiate between civilian and military targets and their use in
populated areas contravenes international agreements relating to war.
MOABs are deemed to be internationally outlawed. So does the use of this internationally banned weapon conform to the
shining principles declared by the Anglo-American leadership in order to
justify the brutal invasion of Iraq? Will anyone answer? Arab News Opinion 14 April 2003 |
Copyright 2014 Q Madp www.OurWarHeroes.org